# Contact the editorial desk

> Contact the desk - Research Peptide Fundamentals research peptides - Checked Peptides — How to reach Checked Peptides about citations, corrections or newly published trials on Research Peptide Fundamentals research peptides.

**THE DESK / CORRESPONDENCE**

Corrections, new trial readouts, and citations that belong on the list.

## Editorial correspondence

This desk keeps a register of what is missing from a literature, which means it goes out of date in a specific and predictable way: every time a trial reports, a gap recorded here either narrows or closes. Notes about newly published results are therefore the most valuable messages it receives, particularly from the ongoing retatrutide outcome programme [8], from any controlled human trial of BPC-157 [2], and from any tissue-level measurement of NAD+ [13].

Corrections are equally welcome. A figure quoted loosely, a study characterised more strongly than its design supports, a regulatory status that has moved, or a citation that belongs on the [references page](/references) and is not there. A message is easiest to act on when it names three things: the page, the exact sentence in question, and the source that settles it, with an identifier where one exists.

**Editorial mailbox:** editors@checkedpeptides.com

## What this desk cannot help with

So that no message sits unanswered for the wrong reason, a few requests fall outside what an independent literature digest can do.

- It cannot advise on, endorse or comment on human use of any compound covered here.
- It cannot suggest an amount, a schedule or a route for anyone, whatever the circumstances.
- It cannot recommend, review, verify or name a supplier, and it does not evaluate products.
- It cannot interpret an individual's symptoms, results or medical history, which requires a clinician with access to the person.

Anything on this site that concerns a real decision about health belongs in a conversation with a qualified professional, not in an inbox. What this desk can do is say precisely what has been published, what has not, and which study would settle the difference.

---

Checked Peptides is an independent reading desk that keeps a written record of what peptide research has not established yet: it sells nothing, prescribes nothing, and treats a missing study as a fact worth printing.